During SPiN’s Season 3 League session, questions were asked about the ‘Set Win Percentage’ (# Sets Won / # Sets Played). Here’s the ranking of the Div1 players at the time by set win %:
|Rank by Set Win %||Div1 Player List||Set Win %|
Vivian was officially ranked 8th, Roman 10th, and Klaus 9th on SPiN’s League ladder. Roman has beaten The Denier before and Vivian, Gideon and the Aussie has taken him deep into matches. What gives?
A similar story can be seen with Div2:
|Rank||Div2 Player List||Set Win %|
At the time Gord ranked 6th, The ThunderBolt 13th, and Irmina 9th.
So how is it they lag in ranking points?
In all cases, each of these players played a handful of weeks, ‘robbing’ them of precious points in the leaderboard race:
|Player||Number of wks played (of 8)|
|Gord||4 wks (50%)|
|Irmina||4 wks (50%)|
|The Thunderbolt||4 wks (50%)|
|Roman||3 wks (38%)|
|Vivian||3 wks (38%)|
|Craig M||3 wks (38%)|
|Klaus||2 wks (25%)|
(it is worth mentioning that set win % does become the tie-breaker when players have an equal number of ranking points)
So what does this all mean?
In some leagues, the Set Win % defines a player’s ranking. In some circles this is the best way to determine a higher ranked player – there’s no question that set win % is a serious indicator of pong power.
But our goal was never to find the best player in the city. They have pro leagues for that. This format was designed for Joes… Joes that have busy schedules, things that come up, and other activities to conquer. That’s the beauty of a ‘pay-as-you-play’ League.
Traditional leagues punish everyday Joes but this format allows them to still participate, and if played enough, can still have a shot at winning (not to mention the opportunity to fill their trash bucket to dish some serious insults, brags, and boasting techniques)
For more info on the scoring system, read a previous post, ‘The Scoring system – the format that cares‘. I assure you that you’ll feel more loved after reading it.